Taking Growth into Consideration
The system provides a tool to extrapolate year-over-year growth. This can be useful where there is an established pattern of annual growth (or reduction). By taking growth into consideration, the calculated forecast will be modified to extrapolate the change between recent demand and that of the prior year. Growth can be an increase in demand, and it can also be a decrease in demand for Products that are being replaced or phased out.
The recalculation routine (PO25) compares the past demand statistics in order to calculate a growth factor. The growth factor indicates whether this Product is increasing or decreasing in demand, and offers the operator the ability to apply some reasonableness checks. If the calculated growth factor is too high, or too low when compared to historical numbers, the forecast can be adjusted to limit the effects of this ‘peak’ or ‘valley’ in the data. The resultant growth factor is applied to the usage forecast (after normalization and weighting).
A growth factor is calculated by using the following formula:
Growth Factor = Recent Demand (for # months specified) / Prior Year
Historical Demand (for # months specified)
The ‘# Months Comparison for Growth’ field in PO07 is used to determine the comparison timeframe for the calculation of a growth factor. Entering a value of 12 in this field causes the system to compare all twelve months this year to the twelve months of last year; entering a value of 6 in this field compares the most recent past six months of demand to the corresponding six months of the previous year. Entering a value of 0 in this field means that a growth factor will not be calculated. Similarly, if a Product does not have sufficient history, a growth factor will not be calculated (until enough months of demand have accumulated in order to invoke the calculation).
Note: The system retains 24 months of demand history. The most recent history is always compared to the previous history for the corresponding months in order to calculate a growth factor.
The Growth Factor is given a reasonability test using the ‘Lower Growth Factor’ and the ‘Upper Growth Factor’ fields. If the ratio of Recent Demand to Historical Demand falls within these limits, then the Growth Factor is considered to be reasonable. If it does not fall within these limits, then the Product is experiencing rapid growth or decline that is deemed to be ‘unreasonable’ and requiring limitation.
- If the growth factor that is calculated from the comparison of historical booking quantities is less than the value entered in the ‘Lower Growth Factor’ field, then the value in this field is used by the forecast calculation program (PO25) instead of the calculated growth factor.
- If the ‘Lower Growth Factor’ field is set to 0, there is no lower limit test for the growth factor. As long as the calculated growth factor is less than the ‘Upper Growth Factor’ limit, the growth factor is accepted by the forecast recalculation routine.
-
If the growth factor that is calculated from the comparison of historical data is greater than the value entered in the ‘Upper Growth Factor’ field, then the value in this field is used by the forecast calculation program (PO25) instead of the calculated growth factor.
- If the ‘Upper Growth Factor’ field is set to 0, there is no upper limit test for the growth factor. As long as the calculated growth factor is greater than the ‘Lower Growth Factor’ limit, the growth factor is accepted by the forecast recalculation routine.
- If both the Upper and Lower Growth Factor limits are set to 0, the calculated growth factor is accepted, regardless of the percentage increase or decrease in growth.
The following two examples illustrate how Upper Growth Factors can limit the effects that rapid growth has on inventory levels:
- Limiting the Effects of Unexpected Growth
The following chart shows the annual demand for a typical Product. The large spike in the centre of the chart for this example can skew the average demand for this Product over time if left unchecked. By utilizing the Upper Growth Factor limit, the system ‘smooths’ the peak so that its effect on the average demand is lessened. The net effect is for the forecast to rise, but not as severely as is expected without the moderating influence.
This technique is useful for moderating the effects of one-time Customer purchases, unexpected ‘runs’ on Products for short periods of time, and other instances where demand may peak briefly then return to a more normal level.
- Limiting the Effects of Rapid Growth
The following chart shows the effect that a continuous use of limiting growth factors will have on inventory levels. Where a rapid increase in Product demand causes more inventory to be purchased, a limited growth moderates the overall effect on inventory levels.
Caution: A moderating influence might result in a ‘too-sluggish’ response to dramatic changes in the marketplace.
The effects of limiting Product that is decreasing in demand can be considered by inverting these charts such that the indicators for rapid growth become those for rapid decline.
Planning for Additional Growth
The ‘Additional Growth Factor’ field represents a user-specified additional (i.e. future) growth rate to be applied to the forecast calculation. Entering zero in this field skips the calculation. The weighted demand is multiplied by the value stored in this field. For example, if the Additional Growth Factor is 1.25, then the weighted usage value is increased by an additional 25%.
Additional Growth can be used to massage the forecasted usage when known influences, not reflected in history, affect the bookings. These influences may be market oriented or may be business driven.
-
For example, we know that a Product, which has consistent bookings and possible growth figures, will suffer as a result of the release of a strong competitive product. We can force down the forecasted usage by entering a factor less than 1.
- Similarly, if we know our Supplier is putting on a major marketing effort which will likely spur bookings on, we can increase the usage by using a factor greater than one. This will force the forecasted usage upwards.
- In circumstances where we might purchase a competitor or open a new location we can raise the usage to accommodate the added demand.
If an “Additional Growth Factor” is implemented, it is usually done at a specific time for a specific reason. As such, you should review the results periodically. When the growth factor is initially set up, it should accomplish what we immediately wish the effect to be (i.e. raise usage by 25%).
For example, we use a Forecast Calculation Code that uses only the last 3 periods as the primary weighting. We know that a specific Product will likely drop in bookings by 30% as a result of a new release of a competitive Product. We set up our Product with a Forecast Calculation code that includes a growth factor of 0.7. After the first period, we have a period of booking history that reflects a timeframe when the “competitor” was out there. This history is one of the three months we are weighting and therefore our resulting weighted average includes the declining demand, the other two periods do not. Therefore we should consider changing the factor to possible 0.8 for the next period and to 0.9 for the period after that. At the end of the 3 periods, we can turn the growth factor off as all 3 periods being weighted in our calculation were at a time when the competitive Product was released. The system continues to possibly force a downward growth automatically as it compares recent booking to those of a year ago.
For more information on the Automated Purchasing Process, please see the following topics: